TFNC Home
Donate Today
 

Toxic Free NC Responds to NC Report on Ag-Mart, Pesticides and Birth Defects


* Download Toxic Free NC’s full white paper, “Summary and critique of North Carolina’s report on pesticides and birth defects among three Ag-Mart workers” [PDF, 82 KB]

Former migrant worker Francisca Herrera holds her son Carlos Candelario in the family's trailer in Florida City.

Palm Beach Post file photo.


In Brief

The North Carolina Division of Public Health has released a much-anticipated report assessing the connections between the severe birth defects in three babies born to farmworkers and their pesticide exposures while working for Ag-Mart in North Carolina. The report, released by the NC Division of Public Health’s Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch (OEEB), evaluated the likely pesticide exposures for each of the three women and the duration and timing of these exposures during the critical periods in their pregnancies. The authors concluded that while there is not enough evidence to definitively “prove” whether pesticides caused the birth defects, there is ample cause for suspicion.

It is important to note that in epidemiological studies such as this one, it is virtually impossible to definitively “prove” causation. What the report does show are unacceptable exposures to known toxicants, a plausible cause (the exposures), and three tragic outcomes. The evidence gathered for this report was compelling enough to lead the NC Division of Public Health to make several recommendations for state and federal agencies. The recommendations included strengthening pesticide enforcement at the NC Department of Agriculture, establishing a state pesticide illness & injury surveillance program, improving education of farmworkers and physicians, and strengthening the federal Worker Protection Standard (WPS).


Recommendations

The state’s recommendations focus primarily on practical steps for state agencies, but unfortunately do not take into account some major factors that may limit their effectiveness – namely the practical realities affecting farmworkers. Because of the very limited political power of farmworkers, many of whom are undocumented migrants, farmworkers are unlikely to be able to effect much change in working conditions, no matter how much energy is invested in education and outreach efforts. In response to this report and ongoing dialogue among state agencies and farmworker advocacy groups, Toxic Free NC offers some additional recommendations to improve the health and safety of farmworkers in North Carolina’s fields.

1. Improve the NC Department of Agriculture’s pesticide enforcement. More pesticide investigators are needed, especially fluent Spanish speakers. Investigators must protect the anonymity of workers who report pesticide violations or participate in investigations.

2. The NC Department of Agriculture and/or Department of Labor should require thorough training and certification in Worker Protection Standards for growers and crew leaders who employ farmworkers. Most education efforts are directed at the workers themselves, who are typically not able to change working conditions no matter how well trained they may be.

3. Ag-Mart should be held accountable for the hundreds of pesticide violations that may have caused the tragic birth defects in all three families. While the states can collect limited fines, they should also require that the company cover the health care costs for the affected children, whose care is likely to be far beyond the reach of their families.

4. The use of teratogenic and mutagenic pesticides should be immediately discontinued by US EPA. If the EPA does not act quickly to protect children’s health, then the states should step in.

5. The NC General Assembly should act immediately to fully fund a pesticide illness and injury surveillance system for the state. Without a pesticide surveillance system, it is virtually impossible to know whether the state’s regulations, enforcement, outreach and intervention methods are actually successful in preventing exposures.

6. The NC Department of Agriculture should institute a pesticide use reporting requirement, similar to the program used in California, so that clear records of pesticide use are available to affected parties. As it stands, there is no federal or NC requirement that growers keep track of which pesticides they use, where or when.


Media coverage of the Ag-Mart case

Raleigh News & Observer (NC)

Palm Beach Post (FL)


Take Action: Write a Letter to the Editor!


More information:

 

 
919-833-5333 | Toll-Free in NC: 1-877-NO-SPRAY (1-877-667-7729) |
2008 Toxic Free North Carolina. All Rights Reserved